Technical Documentation

Calculation Methodology

A comprehensive overview of the heat transfer correlations, pressure drop models, and thermodynamic methods implemented in ExCoil. All calculations are based on peer-reviewed publications and industry-standard references.

1. Overview

ExCoil implements a comprehensive thermal analysis engine for finned-tube heat exchangers commonly used in HVAC&R systems. The calculation methodology follows the ε-NTU (effectiveness-NTU) method as described in the ASHRAE Handbook of Fundamentals [14], combined with detailed correlations for heat transfer coefficients and pressure drop on both the air side and the fluid side.

The software supports five types of heat exchangers, each with specific correlations tailored to their operating conditions:

CalculatorFluid SideFlow RegimeKey Correlations
DX EvaporatorRefrigerantTwo-phase + SuperheatChen, Dittus-Boelter, MSH
DX CondenserRefrigerantDesuperheat + Two-phase + SubcoolDittus-Boelter, Chen, MSH
Chilled WaterWater/GlycolSingle-phaseGnielinski, Churchill
Hot WaterWater/GlycolSingle-phaseGnielinski, Churchill
Steam CoilSteamCondensationNusselt film condensation

The overall heat transfer rate is determined by the thermal resistance network:

Overall Heat Transfer Coefficient (UA)
1/UA = 1/(η₀ × h_air × A_ext) + R_fouling + ln(D_o/D_i)/(2π × k_tube × L × N_tubes) + 1/(h_fluid × A_int)
Where η₀ is the surface efficiency, h_air is the air-side heat transfer coefficient, A_ext is the external surface area, h_fluid is the fluid-side coefficient, and A_int is the internal surface area.

2. Air-Side Heat Transfer

The air-side heat transfer coefficient is calculated using the Colburn j-factor method, based on the work of Wang, Chi & Chang (2000) [1] and Kim, Youn & Webb (1999) [2]. These correlations were developed from extensive experimental data on plain fin-and-tube heat exchangers with staggered tube arrangements, covering a wide range of geometric parameters.

Colburn j-Factor (N_rows ≤ 2)
j = 0.108 × Re_Dc^(-0.29) × (F_p/D_c)^0.2 × N_rows^(-0.031)
For developing flow conditions with 1-2 tube rows, where Re_Dc is the Reynolds number based on collar diameter, F_p is the fin pitch, and D_c is the collar diameter.
Colburn j-Factor (N_rows ≥ 3)
j = 0.086 × Re_Dc^(-0.30) × (F_p/D_c)^0.14 × N_rows^(-0.04)
For fully developed flow conditions with 3 or more tube rows.
Air-Side Heat Transfer Coefficient
h_air = j × G_max × c_p,air × Pr_air^(-2/3) × F_fin × C_air
Where G_max = ρ_air × V_max is the mass velocity through the minimum free area, Pr_air ≈ 0.71, F_fin is the fin type enhancement factor, and C_air is a calibration factor.

The maximum velocity V_max is calculated from the face velocity divided by the free area ratio σ, which accounts for the blockage caused by tubes and fins. The Reynolds number is based on the collar diameter D_c = D_o + 2t_fin.

Fin TypeEnhancement FactorTypical Application
Plain1.00Standard coils, low pressure drop
Wavy1.15Most common in HVAC applications
Louver1.25High performance, compact coils
Slit1.30Maximum heat transfer enhancement

3. Air-Side Pressure Drop

The air-side pressure drop is calculated using the Fanning friction factor approach from Wang et al. (2000) [1], combined with entrance contraction and exit expansion losses from Kays & London (1984) [8]. The total pressure drop consists of three components:

Core Friction Pressure Drop
ΔP_core = 4 × f × N_rows × (ρ_air × V_max² / 2)
Where f is the Fanning friction factor and N_rows is the number of tube rows in the flow direction.
Fanning Friction Factor (N_rows ≤ 2)
f = 0.508 × Re_Dc^(-0.521) × (F_p/D_c)^(-0.318) × F_fin,friction
Fanning Friction Factor (N_rows ≥ 3)
f = 0.455 × Re_Dc^(-0.518) × (F_p/D_c)^(-0.30) × N_rows^(0.031) × F_fin,friction
Entrance and Exit Losses
ΔP_entrance = K_c × (ρ × V_max² / 2), K_c = 0.42 × (1 - σ²) ΔP_exit = K_e × (ρ × V_max² / 2), K_e = (1 - σ²)
Based on Kays & London (1984) sudden contraction and expansion coefficients, where σ is the free area ratio.
Total Air-Side Pressure Drop
ΔP_air = ΔP_core + ΔP_entrance + ΔP_exit

4. Fin Efficiency & Surface Efficiency

Fin efficiency is calculated using the Schmidt (1949) [7] approximation for annular fins. This method provides an accurate estimate of the temperature distribution along the fin, accounting for the fin's thermal conductivity, thickness, and the air-side heat transfer coefficient.

Fin Efficiency
η_fin = tanh(m × L_fin) / (m × L_fin) where m = √(2 × h_air / (k_fin × t_fin))
L_fin is the effective fin height, k_fin is the fin thermal conductivity (e.g., 205 W/m·K for aluminum), and t_fin is the fin thickness.
Overall Surface Efficiency
η₀ = 1 - (A_fin / A_total) × (1 - η_fin)
Where A_fin is the fin surface area and A_total = A_fin + A_prime is the total external surface area including the prime (bare tube) surface.

The external surface area is calculated from the actual tube count and geometry, considering both the fin surface area (both sides of each fin) and the prime tube surface between fins:

External Surface Area
A_prime = π × D_o × L_tube,net × N_tubes,total A_fin = 2 × (P_t × N_tubes,H × P_l × N_rows - π × (D_o/2)² × N_tubes,total) × N_fins A_ext = A_prime + A_fin
Where L_tube,net is the tube length minus fin material, N_fins is the total number of fins, and the factor 2 accounts for both sides of each fin.

5. Refrigerant Two-Phase Heat Transfer

For DX evaporators and condensers, the two-phase heat transfer coefficient is calculated using a simplified Chen (1966) [11] correlation approach. The method combines the liquid-only forced convection contribution with an enhancement factor that accounts for the nucleate boiling and convective boiling mechanisms.

Two-Phase Heat Transfer Coefficient (Evaporation)
h_tp = h_lo × S(x) × C_tp where h_lo = 0.023 × Re_lo^0.8 × Pr_l^0.4 × (k_l / D_i) and S(x) = 1 + 2.5x + 1.5x²
h_lo is the Dittus-Boelter liquid-only coefficient, S(x) is the two-phase enhancement factor as a function of vapor quality x, and C_tp is a calibration factor.

For the superheated vapor region (in evaporators) and the subcooled liquid region (in condensers), the Dittus-Boelter (1930) [10] correlation is used:

Single-Phase Heat Transfer (Dittus-Boelter)
Nu = 0.023 × Re^0.8 × Pr^n
Where n = 0.4 for heating (evaporator superheat) and n = 0.3 for cooling (condenser subcooling). Valid for Re > 10,000 and 0.6 < Pr < 160.

6. Refrigerant Two-Phase Pressure Drop

The two-phase pressure drop is one of the most critical parameters in heat exchanger design. ExCoil uses the Müller-Steinhagen & Heck (1986) [3] correlation, which has been cited over 1,400 times and is widely recognized for its accuracy across a broad range of fluids and conditions. The total two-phase pressure drop consists of three components: frictional, acceleration, and return bend losses.

6.1 Frictional Pressure Drop — Müller-Steinhagen & Heck (1986)

MSH Correlation
ΔP_fric = G_MSH × (1-x)^(1/3) + ΔP_go × x³ where G_MSH = ΔP_lo + 2 × (ΔP_go - ΔP_lo) × x
ΔP_lo and ΔP_go are the liquid-only and gas-only pressure drops calculated assuming the entire mass flow rate flows as that single phase. x is the average vapor quality.

The liquid-only and gas-only pressure drops are calculated using the Darcy-Weisbach equation with the Churchill (1977) [4] friction factor, which is valid for all flow regimes (laminar, transitional, and turbulent):

Churchill Friction Factor (All Flow Regimes)
f = 8 × [(8/Re)^12 + 1/(A + B)^1.5]^(1/12) where A = [2.457 × ln(1/((7/Re)^0.9 + 0.27 × ε/D))]^16 and B = (37530/Re)^16
ε/D is the relative pipe roughness (default 1.5×10⁻⁶ m for copper tubes). This equation seamlessly transitions between f = 64/Re (laminar) and the Colebrook equation (turbulent).

6.2 Acceleration Pressure Drop

During evaporation, the fluid accelerates as it changes from liquid to vapor (increasing specific volume). This momentum change creates an additional pressure drop. During condensation, the opposite occurs, partially recovering pressure.

Acceleration Pressure Drop
ΔP_acc = G² × (M_out - M_in) where M = (1-x)²/[ρ_l × (1-α)] + x²/[ρ_g × α] and α = 1 / [1 + ((1-x)/x) × (ρ_g/ρ_l)]
G is the mass flux (kg/m²·s), M is the momentum flux, and α is the homogeneous void fraction. For evaporation, ΔP_acc > 0; for condensation, ΔP_acc < 0.

6.3 Total Two-Phase Pressure Drop

Total Refrigerant Pressure Drop
ΔP_total = ΔP_frictional (MSH) + ΔP_acceleration + ΔP_return_bends
All three components are calculated per circuit and then combined. The number of return bends per circuit is (N_tubes_per_circuit - 1).

7. Single-Phase Flow (Water/Glycol)

For chilled water and hot water coils, the internal heat transfer coefficient is calculated using the Gnielinski (1976) [12] correlation for turbulent flow in smooth tubes, which is more accurate than Dittus-Boelter for the transition region (2300 < Re < 10,000):

Gnielinski Correlation
Nu = (f/8) × (Re - 1000) × Pr / [1 + 12.7 × (f/8)^0.5 × (Pr^(2/3) - 1)] Valid for: 2300 < Re < 5×10⁶ and 0.5 < Pr < 2000
The friction factor f is calculated using the Churchill (1977) equation. For laminar flow (Re < 2300), Nu = 3.66 for constant wall temperature.

The water-side pressure drop includes straight tube friction (Darcy-Weisbach with Churchill friction factor) and return bend losses:

Single-Phase Pressure Drop
ΔP_straight = f × (L/D_i) × (ρ × V² / 2) ΔP_bends = K_bend × N_bends × (ρ × V² / 2) ΔP_total = ΔP_straight + ΔP_bends
K_bend depends on the bend radius ratio (r/D): K = 1.5 for r/D ≤ 1.5, K = 1.0 for 1.5 < r/D ≤ 2.5, K = 0.7 for r/D > 2.5 (Idelchik, 1986).

8. Return Bend Losses

Return bends (U-bends) in heat exchangers contribute significantly to the total pressure drop, typically adding 30-50% to the straight-tube friction losses. ExCoil calculates return bend losses using the methodology of Geary (1975) [5]for single-phase flow and Padilla et al. (2009) [6] for two-phase flow.

Two-Phase Return Bend Pressure Drop
ΔP_bend = K_bend × φ²_bend × G² / (2 × ρ_tp) × N_bends where φ²_bend = 1 + (ρ_l/ρ_g - 1) × [B × x × (1-x) + x²] and ρ_tp = 1 / [x/ρ_g + (1-x)/ρ_l]
B ≈ 2.0 is an empirical constant for 180° return bends. The two-phase multiplier φ² accounts for the increased pressure drop due to the two-phase mixture navigating the bend.
Bend Radius Ratio (r/D)K_bendSource
≤ 1.5 (tight bend)1.5Idelchik (1986)
1.5 – 2.5 (standard)1.0Idelchik (1986)
> 2.5 (gentle bend)0.7Idelchik (1986)

9. Steam Coil Methodology

Steam coils operate under condensation conditions on the tube side. The internal heat transfer coefficient is calculated using the Nusselt film condensation theory, which assumes a thin laminar film of condensate flowing along the inner tube wall under gravity.

Nusselt Film Condensation
h_steam = 0.725 × [ρ_l × (ρ_l - ρ_g) × g × h_fg × k_l³ / (μ_l × D_i × ΔT)]^0.25
Where h_fg is the latent heat of vaporization, k_l is the liquid thermal conductivity, μ_l is the liquid viscosity, and ΔT is the temperature difference between steam saturation temperature and tube wall temperature.

Steam properties (saturation temperature, latent heat, density) are calculated from the steam pressure using polynomial fits derived from the IAPWS-IF97 steam tables. The air-side calculations follow the same Wang et al. (2000) methodology as the other calculator types.

10. Refrigerant Property Database

ExCoil includes a comprehensive refrigerant property database covering the most commonly used refrigerants in HVAC&R applications. Properties are calculated using polynomial curve fits derived from NIST REFPROP data, ensuring accuracy across the operating range of each refrigerant.

RefrigerantTypeGWPApplication
R-22HCFC1,810Legacy systems (phase-out)
R-134aHFC1,430Medium temperature, chillers
R-410AHFC Blend2,088Residential & commercial AC
R-404AHFC Blend3,922Low temperature refrigeration
R-407CHFC Blend1,774R-22 replacement
R-32HFC675Next-gen AC systems (low GWP)

For each refrigerant, the following thermodynamic and transport properties are available as functions of temperature and/or pressure:

Thermodynamic Properties

  • • Saturation pressure vs. temperature
  • • Liquid and vapor density
  • • Liquid and vapor specific heat
  • • Latent heat of vaporization
  • • Liquid and vapor enthalpy

Transport Properties

  • • Liquid and vapor viscosity
  • • Liquid and vapor thermal conductivity
  • • Surface tension
  • • Prandtl number (derived)

11. Validation & Design Limits

ExCoil includes built-in validation checks to ensure calculations remain within the valid range of the underlying correlations. When parameters fall outside recommended ranges, the software generates warnings to alert the engineer.

ParameterRecommended RangeWarning Condition
Air face velocity1.0 – 3.5 m/s< 1.0 or > 3.5 m/s
Fins per inch (FPI)8 – 16 FPI< 8 or > 16 FPI
Number of rows1 – 8 rows> 8 rows
Liquid velocity (refrigerant)0.3 – 2.5 m/s< 0.3 or > 2.5 m/s
Vapor velocity (refrigerant)3.0 – 20.0 m/s< 3.0 or > 20.0 m/s
Water velocity0.3 – 3.0 m/s< 0.3 or > 3.0 m/s

The energy balance error is calculated for every simulation to verify thermodynamic consistency. A converged solution typically achieves an energy balance error of 0.00%, confirming that the heat rejected/absorbed on the air side matches the heat absorbed/rejected on the fluid side within numerical precision.

Engineering Disclaimer

Calculations provided by ExCoil are intended as design aids and should be verified by a qualified professional engineer before being used in production systems. The user is solely responsible for validating results and ensuring compliance with applicable codes and standards (ASHRAE, AHRI, EN, etc.).

12. References

[1]
Wang, C.C., Chi, K.Y., Chang, C.J. (2000). "Heat transfer and friction characteristics of plain fin-and-tube heat exchangers, part II: Correlation." International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 43(15), pp. 2693-2700. DOI: 10.1016/S0017-9310(99)00333-6
[2]
Kim, N.H., Youn, B., Webb, R.L. (1999). "Air-side heat transfer and friction correlations for plain fin-and-tube heat exchangers with staggered tube arrangements." Journal of Heat Transfer, 121(3), pp. 662-667. DOI: 10.1115/1.2826033
[3]
Müller-Steinhagen, H., Heck, K. (1986). "A simple friction pressure drop correlation for two-phase flow in pipes." Chemical Engineering and Processing: Process Intensification, 20(6), pp. 297-308. DOI: 10.1016/0255-2701(86)80008-3
[4]
Churchill, S.W. (1977). "Friction-factor equation spans all fluid-flow regimes." Chemical Engineering, 84(24), pp. 91-92.
[5]
Geary, D.F. (1975). "Return bend pressure drop in refrigeration systems." ASHRAE Transactions, 81(1), pp. 250-264.
[6]
Padilla, M., Revellin, R., Bonjour, J. (2009). "Two-phase pressure drop in return bends: Experimental results for R-410A." International Journal of Refrigeration, 32(7), pp. 1776-1783. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrefrig.2009.06.006
[7]
Schmidt, T.E. (1949). "Heat transfer calculations for extended surfaces." Refrigerating Engineering, 57, pp. 351-357.
[8]
Kays, W.M., London, A.L. (1984). "Compact Heat Exchangers." McGraw-Hill, 3rd Edition.
[9]
Idelchik, I.E. (1986). "Handbook of Hydraulic Resistance." Hemisphere Publishing, 2nd Edition.
[10]
Dittus, F.W., Boelter, L.M.K. (1930). "Heat transfer in automobile radiators of the tubular type." University of California Publications in Engineering, 2(13), pp. 443-461.
[11]
Chen, J.C. (1966). "Correlation for boiling heat transfer to saturated fluids in convective flow." Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Process Design and Development, 5(3), pp. 322-329. DOI: 10.1021/i260019a023
[12]
Gnielinski, V. (1976). "New equations for heat and mass transfer in turbulent pipe and channel flow." International Chemical Engineering, 16(2), pp. 359-368.
[13]
Robinson, K.K., Briggs, D.E. (1966). "Pressure drop of air flowing across triangular pitch banks of finned tubes." Chemical Engineering Progress Symposium Series, 62(64), pp. 177-184.
[14]
ASHRAE (2021). "ASHRAE Handbook — Fundamentals." American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers, pp. Chapters 4, 23.

Ready to Design Your Heat Exchanger?

Put these rigorous engineering methods to work. Start designing with ExCoil today.